← Search

Amy Larsen

Saint Paul, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 22W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amy Larsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
L
2026-06-30 · Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Schmelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kylie Dunning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Goodwin: Net Assets Summer 2026 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jon Kruse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-19 · Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Mcalpine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · Cammack/Leach SUMMER 26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Schmelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-01 · Goodwin: Net Assets 2026 Winter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-24 · Cammack/Leach · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Schmelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-02-10 · Cammack/Leach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Schmelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-13 · Cammack/Leach · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Schmelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-11 · Goodwin: Net Assets 2026 Winter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-12-04 · Forsythe: Fall Force · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.6% of games
9.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
10%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova