← Search

Tom Flaherty

— year-end
18 matches · 14W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tom Flaherty to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Bobby Reeves championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-11 · SOAKS LAPENNA/GORMAN · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marcus Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Sanger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Victor Munoz / Paul Phillips
2026-04-25 · SOAKS LAPENNA/GORMAN · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amar Tanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · with Bobby Reeves championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Hai Nguyen / Yoshitaka Yukawa
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · with Danny Le championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · RTC WEBSTER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · RTC WEBSTER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-10 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-08 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 65% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer