← Search

Jim Sanger

Fort Worth, TX
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 30W–14L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jim Sanger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-05-02 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tom Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-21 · RTC WEBSTER (scorpions) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danny Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · RTC WEBSTER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Flores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · RTC GABLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerry Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-07 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Linker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · RTC WEBSTER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Fagley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-01 · RTC GABLE · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kerry Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-01-10 · RTC WEBSTER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Linker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68.6%
24W–11L · 53.6% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King