← Search

Natalie Nofsinger

Hesperia, CA
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
82 matches · 33W–49L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Natalie Nofsinger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
W
2026-09-12 · IE-Redlands-Rydall · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Terri Burchinal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gayle Vanderlinden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gayle Vanderlinden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gayle Vanderlinden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cesaria Vazquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gayle Vanderlinden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joseph Eiswert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · IE-Redlands-Rydell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cesaria Vazquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-14 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Samp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Giles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Sharpe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
34.9%
15W–28L · 43% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 44.6% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 50.4% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal