← Search

Tracy Craddock

— year-end
85 matches · 16W–69L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tracy Craddock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Morgan-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tori Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · Taylor - CCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-04 · Hairston-GGCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Liz Vickers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · Shurden CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kelli Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-28 · Vickie Dodd · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Chenault
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · Shurden CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Caston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · Hairston-GGCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Bierbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Shurden CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Frances Varner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Shurden CCC · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lauren Caston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-12 · Williams-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Wicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · Williams-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Wicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
L
Betsy Belk
2026-05-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 29.8% of games
3.0
0%
0W–14L · 28.2% of games
3.5
16.7%
5W–25L · 33.2% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 25.5% of games
6.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.6% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.3% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert