← Search

Beth Joel

Cleveland, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 43W–36L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Beth Joel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Taylor - CCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Jeffreys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Spradling-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · Taylor - CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Georgia Wilson Tindall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Lusk-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Sledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Spradling-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Campbell Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-28 · Spradling-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathryn Boykin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · Lusk-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Sledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-22 · Spradling-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Blair Campbell Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Sledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 56.4% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 53.4% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 43.3% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.1% of games
7.5
75%
9W–3L · 56% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 53% of the time
#2 Doubles
53%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova