← Search

Tricia McBride

— year-end
133 matches · 61W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tricia McBride to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
L
2026-05-27 · Hits Happen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Dalmass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynne Huggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-28 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-21 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Cahill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-31 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bridgette Doheny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-03-24 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dina Viteretti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-10 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-03 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Connie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-02 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Digeronimo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-24 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-23 · Naples Reserve / Huggins · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Connie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
31.7%
19W–41L · 42.8% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 68.9% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.9% of games
8.0
43.6%
17W–22L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#1 Singles
17%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert