← Search

Amanda Fowler

Naples, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 21W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amanda Fowler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
L
2026-05-05 · COLLIER/Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · COLLIER/Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · Sterling Oaks /Gardner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-09 · COLLIER/Gardner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-02 · COLLIER/Gardner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-20 · Winter Winners/ Sanchez Casal/ Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-06 · Winter Winners/ Sanchez Casal/ Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-01 · Fall Winners/Sterling Oaks / Gardner · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-25 · Sterling Oaks / Gardner · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Candace Azad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-18 · Sterling Oaks / Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-11 · Sterling Oaks / Gardner · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-11-10 · Fall Winners/Sterling Oaks / Gardner · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 48.4% of games
4.0
36%
9W–16L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
25 matches
#2 Singles
28%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert