← Search

Jeffrey Pipe

Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 12W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Pipe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Frick Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · Frick Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Frick Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Frick Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Frick Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Hejmowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phillip Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Evan McGill / Sean Weissert
2025-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ned Schano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Norman Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
Zenas Zhuang / Nick Huang
2024-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Phillip Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 3-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
26.1%
12W–34L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 61% of the time
#2 Doubles
61%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King