← Search

Jacob Braun

Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 81W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacob Braun to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Oxford Smash Squad · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aashish Jog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bummer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bummer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bummer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mac Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-20 · Caber Toss · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Noah Jemison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Oxford · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Bummer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · Oxford · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-17 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Barber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-02 · Oxford · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-07 · Grim Rippers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Freedline mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-11-02 · AMD - Oxford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Pefferman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.0
82.6%
19W–4L · 59.6% of games
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.7% of games
4.0
70%
21W–9L · 55.2% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
10W–8L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.1% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal