← Search

Chris Summers

Hickory, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
106 matches · 52W–54L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Chris Summers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history106 matches
W
2026-09-09 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Salem Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-29 · Moore-Kiser/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mindy Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · Moore-Kiser/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mindy Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-19 · vonAllmen/HCP/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Salem Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarita Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Garmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-27 · CIty Heat · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Gettys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-19 · CIty Heat · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Meier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carissa Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Garmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-18 · CIty Heat · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liza Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Moore/HCP/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carissa Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
27.8%
5W–13L · 38% of games
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
40.5%
17W–25L · 47.7% of games
5.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.2% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams