← Search

Chad Trued

Meridian, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 73W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chad Trued to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Untouchaballs · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brijean Brennan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-08 · Untouchaballs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angie O'Hara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-27 · Untouchaballs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Angie O'Hara mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
Rachel Kincheloe / Brian Johnson
2026-08-18 · Untouchaballs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brijean Brennan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-01 · Casual Sets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Haycock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Casual Sets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Haycock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · Casual Sets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Raymond Verveckken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-10 · Casual Sets · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Felt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · Casual Sets · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-05 · Casual Sets · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-18 · Casual Sets · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Haycock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-03 · Ball Of Duty · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ira Fagin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 64.6% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
48.6%
18W–19L · 52.5% of games
4.0
27.7%
13W–34L · 43.9% of games
6.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.8% of games
7.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 55.4% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 47.5% of games
8.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#1 Singles
19%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
31 matches
#2 Singles
7%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams