← Search

Preston Free

Nampa, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 83W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Preston Free to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Delaney Seymour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Delaney Seymour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-19 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Delaney Seymour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · Until Smooth · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Delaney Seymour mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Leman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ash Cockcroft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-06-10 · Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eli Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Racketeers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bernie Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
87.9%
29W–4L · 57.6% of games
4.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 49.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.2% of games
7.5mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 54.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
37 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams