← Search

RC Myles

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 42W–18L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add RC Myles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-08-25 · CCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · CCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jared Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · CCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · CCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · CCC NAVY · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Piper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-16 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · CCC NAVY · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefan Wenger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-12 · CCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
74.1%
40W–14L · 58.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams