← Search

Andrew Swanson

Littleton, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 26W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Swanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-01 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ian Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-25 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · BM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliot Payson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-07 · BM BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · BM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · BM BLUE · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-26 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliot Payson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · BM RED · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-19 · BM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burgess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · BM RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eliot Payson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
65.5%
19W–10L · 54.1% of games
3.5
29.2%
7W–17L · 43.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe