← Search

Colton van Mol

SKILLMAN, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
430 matches · 258W–172L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colton van Mol to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history430 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Colts Crew · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · Colts Crew · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ana Mercado mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · Dutch Boys · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Manny Negron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-27 · Colts Crew · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · Colts Crew · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Maria Velazquez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Velazquez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Michael Marinus Young / Emily Sabo
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Velazquez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · with Maria Velazquez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · with Maria Velazquez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · Clutch Crew · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aristotle Abiog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Vanessa Nied / Thomas Fraser
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Hughes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
70.7%
41W–17L · 56.5% of games
4.0
52.8%
66W–59L · 52.4% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.7%
57W–26L · 57.3% of games
7.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
165 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
128 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
123 matches
#1 Singles
2%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova