← Search

Fabio Gomez

Freemansburg, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 44W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Fabio Gomez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-09 · What-A-Racquet · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Gilchrist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · Aceassins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · What-A-Racquet · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert MacAluso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Aceassins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · Aceassins · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Satinder Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · What-A-Racquet · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert MacAluso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer O'Malley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · #1 Doubles · with Valerie Ali championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · with Valerie Ali championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Rachael Vinjamuri / govind vinjamuri
2026-05-17 · Nash Smash · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dongfang Ji mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-16 · FUZZBALLs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pete Hance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · FUZZBALLs · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 58.1% of games
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 50.2% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 65.7% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 53.9% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert