← Search

Natalie Clair

— year-end
27 matches · 19W–8L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Natalie Clair to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-07-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mikaela Leaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · Lanc CC - Spire · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heather Shelton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
Lauren Diulus / Jessica Tracey
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · with Carrie Betteridge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-23 · Lanc CC - Spire · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Betteridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · with Suzanne Woodard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · with Mikaela Leaman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 53.6% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.4% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 59% of the time
#1 Doubles
59%
16 matches
#1 Singles
19%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe