← Search

Carrie Betteridge

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
243 matches · 168W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Betteridge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history243 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Kristi-Lynne Dahlgren / Tammy Miller
2026-07-27 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Opilo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · Hempfield - Covell · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mikaela Leaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rosana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-03 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacquelin Eby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Lancaster CC - Spire/Betteridge · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Funk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · with Rosana Mann championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-02-20 · Lanc CC - Spire · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rosana Mann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.7% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.9% of games
3.5
83.8%
31W–6L · 67.2% of games
4.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 52.1% of games
7.0
69%
20W–9L · 62.3% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
16W–8L · 58.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#1 Singles
14%
35 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert