← Search

Tina Kimbell

— year-end
40 matches · 19W–21L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Tina Kimbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Evetts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · Team 17 Tina Kimbell 6.5W · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ida Gleaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · Team 17 Tina Kimbell 6.5W · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chelsea Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · Team 17 Tina Kimbell 6.5W · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ida Gleaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-06 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Teams36 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 54.3% of games
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 51.6% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 48% of the time
#1 Singles
48%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
5 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer