← Search

Amber Morefield

Prosper, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 35W–32L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Amber Morefield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
Jennifer Jacobs / Amy Farrell
2026-09-13 · Team 11 Bob Day/Young W4.0S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Buitron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abby Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Julie Stein / Isabela Velazquez vivanco
2026-08-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Abby Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · Bob Day TC/Young W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-11 · Spring Park/Bradley W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-06 · Bob Day TC/Young W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-30 · Bob Day TC/Young W4.0S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Buitron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-28 · Spring Park/Bradley W4.0T · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Bob Day TC/Young W4.0S · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 57.1% of games
4.0
43.9%
18W–23L · 45% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.9% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#1 Singles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova