← Search

Luke Fairborn

Crozet, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 99W–57L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Luke Fairborn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-09-03 · BHSC - Colmer - Boar-n To Win · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-27 · BHSC - Colmer - Boar-n To Win · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-25 · BHSC - Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Fairborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-23 · BHSC - Davis · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Fairborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · BHSC - Colmer - Boar-n To Suffer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-16 · BHSC - Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Faith Zabek mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Charles Friel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · BHSC - Watson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with William Manning championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with John Futty championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
90.2%
46W–5L · 66.8% of games
4.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.5% of games
7.5
100%
4W–0L · 58.7% of games
8.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 56.5% of games
7.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.3% of games
8.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50.4% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#1 Singles
16%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova