← Search

Tommy Bader

Midlothian, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
259 matches · 115W–144L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tommy Bader to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history259 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Team Bader · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miguel Romero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-30 · ACAC Delisio Destruction Crew 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kurt Shores
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-27 · Team Bader · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gunjan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · Team Bader · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gunjan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · Team Bader · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bert Teachey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-02 · ACAC Delisio Destruction Crew 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Kasten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Team Bader · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with En-Tien Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-24 · ACAC-Babik · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gunjan Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with En-Tien Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
Sean Reynolds / William Carli
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Mycael McDowell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Belmont - Gregory · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jenny Murray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · ACAC Voigt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Fulcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 60.4% of games
4.5
35.1%
33W–61L · 47% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 51.8% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 47.4% of games
8.5mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
35%
14W–26L · 44.8% of games
9.5mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal