← Search

Rachel Maas

— year-end
112 matches · 30W–82L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Rachel Maas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history112 matches
L
2026-09-13 · WH Freer FWL M18-8.0X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Freer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-12 · COE Isaacs FWL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · COE Witherill WSL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krista Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jin On
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darlene Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolinne Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · WH Freer WSL M18-7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Sloan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · WH Freer WSL M18-7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juan Santos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
Sara Johnson / Eva Lieberman
2026-04-18 · COE Witherill WSL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Brilliant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-11 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-28 · COE Witherill WSL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Rosekrans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
27.3%
6W–16L · 43.8% of games
4.0
25.9%
15W–43L · 41.7% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
31%
9W–20L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King