← Search

Jin On

OKEMOS, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 28W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jin On to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
Sara Johnson
2026-06-20 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Jennifer Brown
2026-04-25 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
Kim Tucker / Mary White
2026-03-14 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · COE Johnson WSL A18-4.0WW · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Emma Astley
2025-12-06 · MSU Vazou FWL A18-3.5WW · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-15 · COE Maas FWL A18-4.0WW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Bock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-11-08 · MSU Vazou FWL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Ellen Ott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · COE Maas FWL A18-4.0WW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Stockall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-4
L
2025-10-18 · COE Maas FWL A18-4.0WW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolinne Ogura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-10-04 · COE Maas FWL A18-4.0WW · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Maas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-3
L
2025-09-27 · MSU Vazou FWL A18-3.5WW · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Sherman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 62.8% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
11 matches
#1 Singles
18%
9 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert