← Search

Lisa Campagna

Baldwinsville, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
203 matches · 92W–111L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Campagna to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history203 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mindy Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-07-16 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-08 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Kmetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Radoff · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-22 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anita Pudusseri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue VanderMeer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Radoff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · Radoff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen MacDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Syracuse: Get a Grip · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
Sara Miller
2025-07-27 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
84%
21W–4L · 68.2% of games
3.5
34.7%
26W–49L · 45.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 49.2% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
21W–30L · 44.7% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
31 matches
#2 Singles
14%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert