← Search

Mary Kaye

New Hartford, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
274 matches · 165W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Kaye to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history274 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Yablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Paolangeli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Yablonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-22 · Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Voyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-15 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Voyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · Yablonski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Elliott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Syracuse: Geary/ Nelligan · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anthony Farella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-20 · Yablonski · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Nelligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-18 · Nelligan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ja Youn Kwon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
61.7%
29W–18L · 54.7% of games
4.0
37.7%
20W–33L · 46.6% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
69W–15L · 62.5% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.5% of games
8.0mixed
51.7%
15W–14L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
78 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe