← Search

Christa Galehouse

Cuyahoga Falls, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
270 matches · 178W–92L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christa Galehouse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history270 matches
L
2026-07-13 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Diamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Loveless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Diamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-0
W
2026-06-08 · 55 7.0W E LT Ruggles · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Diamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karyn Loveless
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · A40 4.0W LT Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Wentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-07-24 · A40 4.0W 3 LT Kim · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Diamond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-07-19 · A18 3.5W LT Lenton · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Wentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6
L
2025-07-18 · A18 3.5W LT Lenton · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with SARAH MARKHAM
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-16 · A40 3.5W LT2 Mathia · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Balc
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-15 · A55 7.0W 2 LT Ruggles · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Wentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-26 · A40 4.0W 3 LT Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with SARAH MARKHAM
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.6% of games
3.5
75.8%
72W–23L · 59.7% of games
4.0
35%
7W–13L · 46.1% of games
6.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.4% of games
7.0
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.4% of games
7.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.8% of games
7.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 59.3% of games
8.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
113 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
7 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert