← Search

Elizabeth Hok

Silver Spring, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 124W–140L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Hok to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Quinlan - It's Ons · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin McVeigh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
L
2026-09-10 · Quinlan - It's Ons · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Savannah Bergen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tucker Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-09-01 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Aylward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-5
W
2026-08-25 · Mennealy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Smoot mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-25 · Pendergast - Fire & Slice · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-08-18 · Pendergast - Fire & Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Sokoloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · Pendergast - Fire & Slice · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gaby Aguirre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Miller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-05 · Mennealy · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Bichy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tucker Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-02 · Racqueteers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Socheata Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.0
43.8%
7W–9L · 48% of games
3.5
41.2%
42W–60L · 47.3% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.3% of games
6.5
52.4%
11W–10L · 53.4% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 49.6% of games
0.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 40.4% of games
6.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.4% of games
7.0mixed
59.4%
19W–13L · 57.4% of games
7.5mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
90 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
83 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
77 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova