← Search

Tucker Howard

COLUMBIA, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
272 matches · 176W–96L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tucker Howard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history272 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Ghim - Wild Cards-singles · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-03 · Quinlan - Aperol Spritzes and Fritzes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Hok mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-09-02 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Gerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-01 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Aylward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Aylward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-27 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandre Fines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-26 · Jeon - ReString · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Maiorana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Hamawy - BigRacquet · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Emmerich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Colin Lippy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-18 · Jeon - ReString · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Ghim - TriFecta-Hi · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Aylward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
100%
8W–0L · 84.5% of games
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 67.1% of games
3.5
72.9%
43W–16L · 61.8% of games
4.0
45.6%
26W–31L · 48.5% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.3% of games
6.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 63.5% of games
7.5
72%
18W–7L · 55.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.8% of games
6.5mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 72.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 57.9% of games
7.5mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 56% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
82 matches
#1 Singles
21%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
46 matches
#2 Singles
8%
21 matches
#3 Singles
4%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert