← Search

Jill Yost

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
181 matches · 52W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Yost to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-06-18 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Cannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-17 · NICE HITS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Friend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anke Heineck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · NICE HITS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with ADRA KIPPER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-04 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · NICE HITS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Rusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · NICE HITS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with ADRA KIPPER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Simply Smashing · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-18 · NICE HITS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · Mister and Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Gopalakrishnan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-11 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
51.2%
21W–20L · 48.9% of games
3.5
18.2%
14W–63L · 37.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43.8% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25.6%
10W–29L · 40.9% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
43 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams