← Search

Kim Agler

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 89W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Agler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Bend & Snap! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-23 · SLAY! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Rohnert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · Bend & Snap! · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Liz Crookston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Bend & Snap! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · Bend & Snap! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-09 · Bend & Snap! · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Novak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · SLAY! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Mckinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Agler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-27 · SLAY! · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Mckinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-23 · Serving Up Trouble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Farrell Kessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-20 · SLAY! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Mckinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · MSA 7.0 (Mas Serve Aces) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Agler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
77.1%
37W–11L · 62.9% of games
3.5
24.5%
12W–37L · 42% of games
6.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 64.1% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.8% of games
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
57 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King