← Search

Peadar Noone

— year-end
9 matches · 4W–5L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Peadar Noone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history9 matches
L
2026-04-19 · SRochkind65-UNC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ken Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-10 · SRochkind65-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Hilsabeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · SRochkind65-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Rochkind
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · SRochkind65-UNC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ralph Gildehaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-06 · SRochkind-UNC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Jaskot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · SRochkind-UNC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Jaskot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-08 · SRochkind-UNC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robert Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-25 · SRochkind-UNC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Molpus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-08-18 · SRochkind-UNC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Richard Jaskot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
Teams2 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 67% of the time
#1 Doubles
67%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova