← Search

Nancy Denig

Chadds Ford, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
295 matches · 196W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Denig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history295 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Lemon Love · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jodi Knapp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Lemon Love · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol McGurk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · Penn Franklins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Delaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · Frog Hollow 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naomi Thorpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Cary Leung / Jennifer Nelson
2026-06-20 · Penn Franklins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aleli Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-12 · Frog Hollow 4.5 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naomi Thorpe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-1
L
2026-06-12 · 55 and Foxy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Penn Franklins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emily Serwo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · Frog Hollow 4.5 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with JODI ESLINGER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-29 · 55 and Foxy · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynne Gunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · with Laurie Memis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-23 · #2 Doubles · with Ada Martini championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
77.8%
98W–28L · 60.2% of games
4.5
20%
6W–24L · 40% of games
8.0
64%
16W–9L · 55% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
32W–24L · 52% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
143 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
93 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert