← Search

Connie Allen

LOVELAND, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 27W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Connie Allen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-07-16 · Queen City Green · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Halonen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-18 · Queen City Green · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dwan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-07-08 · Queen City Gold · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 2-4
L
2025-06-30 · Queen City Gold · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Krummen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-24 · Queen City Gold · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Worley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-10 · Queen City Gold · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 3-2
L
Eugenie Kreutzjans / Laura Tierney
2025-05-27 · Queen City Gold · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Wandtke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2025-05-20 · Queen City Gold · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-12-13 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dwan Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 3-1
W
2024-12-06 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Trusock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-11-22 · Queen City Red · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Kenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 2-1
L
2024-07-22 · Queen City Red · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janet Totin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
35.7%
20W–36L · 46.5% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#1 Singles
13%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe