← Search

Micheline Gardner

Broomfield, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
195 matches · 99W–96L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Micheline Gardner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history195 matches
W
2026-08-10 · BRMST PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janine Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Addie Harris
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Shaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · BRMST PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Shaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · BRMST ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Valerie Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · BRMST ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharla Prom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · BRMST RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Elsa Zimmerer / Carolyn Keim
2026-07-01 · BRMST ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharla Prom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · BRMST RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-24 · BRMST ORANGE · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Lisa Shaver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
51.1%
67W–64L · 52.3% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.6% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 55.3% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
35 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova