← Search

Taryn Giroux

— year-end
84 matches · 44W–40L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Taryn Giroux to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Woodlake Cabral · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Nortz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · Woodlake Cabral · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Nortz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · Woodlake Wked 3.0- Jolinski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dianne Revelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · Woodlake - Phelps · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Loman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Woodlake - Phelps · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Joyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-28 · Woodlake Wked 3.0- Jolinski · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Shannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · Woodlake Wked 3.0- Jolinski · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Woodlake - Phelps · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walter Weiskopf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · Woodlake Wked 3.0- Jolinski · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rochelle Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Woodlake - Phelps · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dan Joyce mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-06 · Woodlake Phelps · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Joyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-01 · Woodlake Brawley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeanean Phelps
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 48.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.2% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 57.3% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.7% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 50.8% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 40% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert