← Search

Amelia Lovette

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 23W–19L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amelia Lovette to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britta Janney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-03 · Westwood Caudill Weekday · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-26 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katrin Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Whiteside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Nord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Elizabeth Khatri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie McLeod
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-28 · Westwood Tri Hards - Mancini · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Singleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Westwood Stanley · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eleanor Lang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-18 · Westwood Stanley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Scheel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-12 · Westwood Stanley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carleen DiMeglio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-4
W
2026-07-11 · Westwood Stanley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Scheel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 51.8% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
3W–3L · 52% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 64.5% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#3 Singles
5%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer