← Search

Jennifer Abt

Montgomery, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 14W–6L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Abt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
W
2026-07-31 · MCC LONG · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amanda Salazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
Miriam Scharf / Jennifer Roberts
2026-04-08 · MCC - Cone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-04-02 · MCC - Cone · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-26 · MCC - Cone · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with MaryEverette Saucer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-05 · MCC - Cone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madelyn Ethington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-19 · MCC - Cone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · MCC - Cone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Freeman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-23 · MCC- Cone · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-10-16 · MCC- Cone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-02 · MCC- Cone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Bronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-07-08 · MCC - Cone · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-3
W
2025-07-03 · MCC - Cone · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 56% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 74.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
2 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova