← Search

Jennifer Henderson

Pike Road, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 68W–18L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Henderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-05 · Wynlakes Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sofi Gelabert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Wynlakes Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caroline Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · Wynlakes Warren · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dabney Albritton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · Wynlakes Warren · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Slack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · Wynlakes Warren · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lynsey Anne Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · MG LONG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alex Cone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-28 · MG LONG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Trott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-12 · MG LONG · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlee Winn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-06 · MCC - GARRETT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · MCC - Cone · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-29 · MCC - GARRETT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Trott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-26 · MCC - Cone · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.6%
51W–10L · 64% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 44.7% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 64.7% of games
7.5
70%
7W–3L · 55.5% of games
3.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
13%
11 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova