← Search

Richard Bland

Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
389 matches · 251W–138L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Richard Bland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history389 matches
L
2026-08-23 · Avalon Ghita 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristopher Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Brent Belding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Avalon Ghita 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gregory Franklin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · Avalon Ghita 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gary Woods
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-06 · Avalon Calhoun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Schultz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Brad Shiveley / Adam Martin
2026-08-01 · #4 Doubles · with Brent Belding championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-30 · Avalon Calhoun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Ulrichs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · Avalon Ghita · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brent Belding
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-14 · Avalon Calhoun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joni Albrecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · Avalon Ghita · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Grainger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · Avalon Ghita · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Melson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · Avalon Calhoun · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mihalko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams89 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
63.9%
69W–39L · 55.2% of games
6.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.9% of games
7.0
76.5%
39W–12L · 62% of games
7.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 44.7% of games
3.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.4% of games
6.5mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 58.8% of games
7.0mixed
76%
57W–18L · 62.7% of games
7.5mixed
60%
9W–6L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
145 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
139 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
100 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert