← Search

ANJA BAUGH

Rockville, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 23W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add ANJA BAUGH to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren McKetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Royster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · HCC Frazier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jose Mendoza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
Wendy Daniel / Beth Jones
2026-08-07 · Hermitage - Harcum · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judi Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · HCC Frazier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Frazier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-07-31 · Hermitage Stinson/Orski · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Stinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · HCC Frazier · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ted Cummings mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · HCC Stinson/Berents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren McKetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-27 · Hermitage - Harcum · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · Hermitage - Harcum · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · 8 Hermitage Stinson/Berents · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy Teal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 51.2% of games
4.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 37.8% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.7% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal