← Search

Dave McCoy

Moseley, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 20W–32L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Dave McCoy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Hayes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-19 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-28 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Schneeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Schneeberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · Woodlake - Mccoy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-31 · Woodlake McCoy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-28 · Woodlake Kroos · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lyman Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-21 · Woodlake Kroos · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lyman Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · Woodlake McCoy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Urban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Woodlake Kroos · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Moss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
45.8%
11W–13L · 48.9% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.5% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert