← Search

Irena Brain

Cary, NC
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
17 matches · 8W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Irena Brain to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2026-07-07 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Sassano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-30 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Sassano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JACK TCHIRKOW mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · ATaylor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Self
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-02 · ATaylor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Pollak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-19 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-12 · ATaylor (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-10-07 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gabriela Cooper-Vespa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-09-23 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Austin Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-16 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gabriela Cooper-Vespa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-26 · ATaylor (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natalie Lombardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-19 · ATaylor (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sheila Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 56.9% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 46.1% of games
4.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe