← Search

Deana Deep

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 28W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Deana Deep to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history65 matches
W
2026-09-11 · AMilas (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amber Filingeri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-28 · AMilas (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-14 · MShuford (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bibi Markel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · AMilas (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Schmitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-24 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Whitney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-27 · JBlack/TStamey (Matthews) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Donoghue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · KWagner (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Adzema
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-27 · SBrown/KWagner (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-24 · KWagner (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-23 · TStamey/JBlack (Matthews) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julian Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 51% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
63.6%
7W–4L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
13 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe