← Search

Amy Sauerland

Colorado Springs, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 60W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Sauerland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LTFCS SHAINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Glimco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · MEMPK OSTLY · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bill Graziano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
W
Irene Larimer / Jan Hyman
2026-08-17 · LTFCS SHAINK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Ostly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Jane Glimco championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Glimco championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · LTFCS SHAINK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judi Ashmen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
Glenda Coto Meckbel / Christine Thiele
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Ostly championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-26 · MEMPK OSTLY · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bill Graziano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · LTFCS SHAINK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Ostly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · LTFCS SAUERLAND · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Ostly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · MEMPK OSTLY · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Bill Graziano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · LTFCS SAUERLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Glimco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63.1%
41W–24L · 55.5% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.1% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#1 Singles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer