← Search

Jane Glimco

Colorado Springs, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 103W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Glimco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
W
2026-08-31 · LTFCS SHAINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Sauerland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · LTFCS SHAINK · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Shaink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Sauerland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Vicki Gess championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Sauerland championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · MEMPK THORNTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Shaink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · LTFCS SHAINK · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Shaink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Carol Pepper / Kari Leach
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Vicki Gess championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · MEMPK THORNTON · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Shaink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-17 · MEMPK THORNTON · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · LTFCS SAUERLAND · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vicki Gess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · with Karen Schaller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
67.4%
62W–30L · 57.5% of games
6.0
80%
12W–3L · 64.3% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe