← Search

Robert Luftglass

Fairfax, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 69W–94L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robert Luftglass to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Dannick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-06 · Team 3 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bentley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · Highly Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Glashow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Highly Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Ramseur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · Highly Strung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Schoeni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
Jonathan Kim / Anand Rajeswaran
2026-04-12 · Highly Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Glashow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-25 · Team 2 Pirates Over 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Sita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-04 · Team 2 Pirates Over 55 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Bhangdia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
Jeanne Baily / Jeff Ross
2025-07-26 · Team 2 Pirates Over 55 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Margaret Sita mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-07-25 · Team 4 Summer ServeAces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Muthukrishnan Ganesan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-07-19 · Team 2 Pirates Over 40 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barry Dickman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
W
2025-07-18 · Team 2 Pirates Over 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen Morrissey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
43.9%
43W–55L · 49.3% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 46.2% of games
8.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.8% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
45.2%
14W–17L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
24 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova