← Search

Jeffrey Steed

Greensboro, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 43W–16L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jeffrey Steed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history59 matches
W
2026-09-01 · SKarasik/DJKarasik (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Chase Lyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-31 · LLKI-King/HNP · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jay Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · Fleihan/Winter 18s 8.5M Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Matt Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · WParker/BBhaskar (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julian Black mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Joshua Perrault
2026-07-24 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Adam Buescher
2026-07-24 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-22 · JTchirkow (Queens) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · Herron/Nutt 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Barnwell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · WParker/BBhaskar (Mason Wallace) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Pickup mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-09 · Herron/Nutt 18s 4.0 Mixed Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Ray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
68.4%
13W–6L · 58.1% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 53.7% of games
8.5
80%
4W–1L · 64.9% of games
4.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.8% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
12 matches
#1 Singles
19%
11 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams