← Search

Barbara Moysaenko

Fort Mill, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 94W–88L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Barbara Moysaenko to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-09-07 · MPaterson (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-04 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Heather Hope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-31 · MPaterson (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with CHRISTI DEWAELE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · MCTA40/Fore/SPRFD · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brittany Gano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · MPaterson (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debra Schwede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · MCTA40/Fore/SPRFD · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa Barhorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · HPhelps (Bridgehampton) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Roxanne Kastein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · MCTA40/Fore/SPRFD · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alice Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-04 · CBiedrzycki (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Virtanen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-03 · MPaterson (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Debra Schwede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · MCTA40/Fore/SPRFD · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · CBiedrzycki (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Quinn Dawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 63.1% of games
3.5
65%
26W–14L · 58.1% of games
4.0
44.6%
25W–31L · 48.6% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.4% of games
6.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 55.6% of games
7.5
50%
18W–18L · 47.7% of games
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.2% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–7L · 31% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
34 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Singles
4%
8 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe